The violence around Trump events

So many commentators and media personalities are bending over backwards to blame Donald Trump and his supporters for the violence that has found its way to his events. In a perfect case of blaming the victim which all the social justice warriors / liberals say they are against, we see political supporters harassed, insulted and finally assaulted.  But like all SJWs, it’s not just the trump supporters or the Trump campaign.  In California we saw a full on riot.  (

They hurt supporters, they destroyed police cars, and generally caused chaos.  They have no sense of actual justice or free speech.  They are in fact the enemies of liberty.

I was not a Donald Trump supporter although I don’t have a lot against Trump, but these criminals need to be addressed. Not by giving in to their childish, yet dangerous demands, but rather by destroying their narrative and not giving one single inch to these groups.

I don’t know whether Donald Trump will help America but I do know he’s the only one not backing down.

The world is against Donald, which alone gains some of my support.


Some in Britain not impressed with President Obama

President Obama is flying to Europe next week to apparently try and talk Britain into staying in the EU.  However some British politicians aren’t impressed.

Mr Johnson (London Mayor) today told the Standard: ‘I honestly don’t mind the idea of him joining the debate.

‘Where we do part company, and where I do mind, is that it is plainly hypocritical for America to urge us to sacrifice control — of our laws, our sovereignty, our money and our democracy — when they would not dream of ever doing the same.’
Mr Rees-Mogg (Bristsh MP) told the House magazine: ‘I don’t mind him coming over to say what he wants because I think it helps Brexit.

‘I can’t think the British people will want to be told what to do by a rather unsuccessful American president who has had one of the least successful foreign policies in modern history.


Are the Saudi’s connected to terror?

Obama to decide on declassifying 9/11 documents within 60 days

President Obama will decide whether to declassify 28 pages of sealed documents — which some suspect show a Saudi connection to the 9/11 attacks — within 60 days, according to a former senator who co-chaired the 2002 joint congressional inquiry into the attacks…

…Both the George W. Bush and Obama administrations have refused to unseal the documents, claiming it would jeopardize national security. Critics claim the reluctance is a calculated move to hide Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the attacks that killed almost 3,000 people.

Ya think?


It would be troublesome but perhaps acceptable for the House of Saud to promote the intolerant and extremist Wahhabi creed just domestically. But, unfortunately, for decades the Saudis have also lavishly financed its propagation abroad. Exact numbers are not known, but it is thought that more than $100 billion have been spent on exporting fanatical Wahhabism to various much poorer Muslim nations worldwide over the past three decades. It might well be twice that number. By comparison, the Soviets spent about $7 billion spreading communism worldwide in the 70 years from 1921 and 1991.
It’s not really news except the US government hasn’t wanted to admit it.
Nearly everywhere in the Muslim world except where Iran holds sway. In the 1980s, Saudi money and fighters poured into Afghanistan to help the mujahedeen fight the Soviets, an effort that gave rise to the Taliban and eventually to al Qaeda. In the 1990s, Saudi aid to the Bosnian Muslims struggling in the wars that broke up Yugoslavia brought the Wahhabi strain of Islam to Europe. That same decade, Saudi money helped to further radicalize Chechnya’s Muslims. One of the cables released by WikiLeaks quotes then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.” Most members of al Qaeda were Saudi, including Osama bin Laden, and 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudis.
They give up just enough intelligence on their enemies to keep the US off their back.

Bill Clinton’s moment of honesty

Sometimes when a person gets a little angry some honesty can result. I’m not now, nor have I ever been a Bill Clinton fan, but compared to the democrat party of today he was almost reasonable. When challenged by numerous Black Lives Matter protesters in Philadelphia last Thursday, Clinton shot back.

…”You are defending the people who killed the lives you say matter,” the former president told protesters…

…”I talked to a lot of African-American groups. They thought black lives mattered; they said take this bill because our kids are being shot in the street by gangs. We had 13-year-old kids planning their own funerals,” Clinton said…

…”I don’t know how you would characterize the gang leaders who got 13-year-old kids hopped up on crack, and sent them out in the streets to murder other African-American children,” the former president said. “Maybe you thought they were good citizens — she didn’t…

Of course, he was called a Republican, well not a republican exactly, but the same tactic used against anyone that disagrees or doesn’t support the Black Lives Movement, the racist card was thrown.

Black Lives Matters has nothing to do with justice or peace, but rather much like the radical Islamic movement, it’s about subjugation. You will bow down before them or face the consequences. These consequences always involve violence, just like most other Social Justice Warriors (SJW). They are part of the problem, not the solution.

Naturally, bill walked much of what he said back and apologized for his words. Still the moment of honesty is refreshing, and coming from the “First Black President”, it’s pretty entertaining.

Police raid anti-migrants

Police in Berlin have raided ten apartments because residents may have posted “anti-migrant” views online.

Berlin Police completed a large scale raid on internet users Wednesday. The officers ransacked ten separate apartments in the German capital in the suburbs of Spandau, Tempelhof, Marzahn, Hellersdorf and Pankow.


there was no evidence of any planned conspiracy to commit crime among them.

In some of the homes searched police were forced to admit they hadn’t found anything at all, but Redlich justified the raids saying they were maybe, “people who just once expressed their hate-opinion.”

Priorities folks.